โ€ โ€

1.        ICT-AGRI Impact Assessment Report
This report is an impact evaluation for ICT-AGRI 1 & 2, two ERA-NET initiatives focused on ICT and robotics in agriculture. It contains methodologies for evaluating impact and recommendations for impact evaluation within ERA-NET projects  

๐Ÿ“„ Link: ICT-AGRI 1 & 2 Impact Assessment Report (2016/2017 ERA-NET impact analysis)

โ€ โ€ โ€

2.        ICT-AGRI Impact model with evaluation objectives and list of indicators

โ€ โ€This document defines evaluation objectives and links them to a structured set of indicators to track outputs, outcomes, and longer-term impacts such as collaboration, innovation uptake, and societal relevance.

โ€ โ€๐Ÿ“„ Link:ICT-AGRI Impact model with evaluation objectives and list of indicators (2015 ERA-NET)

โ€

โ€3.        FACCE Evaluation Report 2020

โ€ โ€This report provides a programme-level evaluation examining alignment between national and European research agendas and the quality and impact of transnational research activities, relevant as an MEIA reference for collaborative agri-food research initiatives.

โ€ โ€๐Ÿ“„ Link: Self-Evaluation of FACCE-JPI 2010-2019: Alignment of National and European Research Programmes and High Quality Transnational Research Activities

โ€ โ€โ€ โ€

4.        Biodiversa+ Guidance on Best Practices for Harmonised Biodiversity Monitoring This document serves as a guidance note introducing key concepts and collaborative approaches for aligning biodiversity monitoring protocols across territories and scales, relevant as an MEIA reference for monitoring system design and transnational coordination.

โ€ โ€๐Ÿ“„ Link: Biodiversa+ Guidance on Best Practices for Harmonised Biodiversity Monitoring 2023

โ€ โ€โ€ โ€

5.        Horizon Europe โ€œKey Impact Pathwaysโ€ evidence framework (indicator framework used by the EC)
This framework serves as the European Commissionโ€™s higher-level monitoring and evaluation indicator structure for Horizon Europe, setting out standard impact pathways (scientific, societal, economic/innovation) and associated indicators, and is relevant as an MEIA reference for aligning programme indicators with funder language, KPI conventions, and reporting expectations.

โ€ ๐Ÿ“„ Link: Horizon Europe โ€œKey Impact Pathwaysโ€ evidence framework (indicator framework used by the EC)

โ€ โ€โ€ โ€

6.        CAP monitoring & evaluation framework handbook and CMEF/PMEF guidance (agricultural policy indicator logic)
This framework provides indicator-logic-oriented guidance underpinning the EUโ€™s Common Agricultural Policy, setting out clear intervention logics and indicator typologies (context, output, result, impact), and is relevant as an MEIA reference for structuring, selecting, and justifying indicators in agri-food and agricultural system interventions.

โ€ โ€๐Ÿ“„ Link: CAP monitoring & evaluation framework handbook and CMEF/PMEF guidance (agricultural policy indicator logic)

โ€ โ€โ€ โ€

7.        European Environment Agency / European Topic Centre report on food systems transition monitoring frameworks and indicators
This report provides a comparative review of existing indicator frameworks used to monitor food systems transitions, synthesising approaches, indicator types, and assessment criteria across initiatives, and is relevant as an MEIA reference for positioning and justifying indicator choices by drawing on an established โ€œmenuโ€ of frameworks and selection rationales.

โ€ โ€๐Ÿ“„Link: European Environment Agency / European Topic Centre report on food systems transition monitoring frameworks and indicators

โ€ โ€โ€ โ€

8.        EJP SOIL Deliverable 6.5: Guidelines for accounting and mapping agricultural soil carbon, fertility and degradation changes
This deliverable provides practical guidance developed under the EJP SOIL monitoring and information harmonisation work, setting out methods, definitions, and change indicators for assessing agricultural soil carbon, fertility, and degradation, and is relevant as an MEIA reference for environment-focused monitoring system design, particularly as a concrete protocol example for defining and operationalising soil-related change indicators.

โ€ โ€๐Ÿ“„Link: EJP SOIL Deliverable 6.5: Guidelines for accounting and mapping agricultural soil carbon, fertility and degradation changes

โ€ โ€โ€ โ€

9.        CORE Organic official document repository
This repository contains official call documents and reporting templates from CORE Organic ERA-Nets (I, II, Plus, and Cofund), including mid-term and other reporting formats that illustrate how monitoring and reporting requirements were structured in practice, and is relevant as an MEIA reference for understanding applied monitoring approaches, indicator expectations, and funder-aligned reporting structures in transnational agri-food research programmes.

โ€ โ€๐Ÿ“„Link: CORE Organic official document repository

โ€ โ€

10.   CORE Organic II Final Report (public report)
This report documents monitoring, reporting, and project oversight practices used under the FP7 CORE Organic II ERA-NET, illustrating how programme-level progress, outputs, and impacts were tracked and synthesised, and is relevant as an MEIA reference for demonstrating practical approaches to monitoring design and impact tracking at transnational programme level.

โ€ โ€๐Ÿ“„Link: CORE Organic II Final Report (public report)

โ€

11.   SUSFOOD2 Strategic Document
This strategic document sets out the SUSFOOD2 ERA-NETโ€™s vision and priorities, including how joint calls integrate multi-actor and food systems approaches, thereby signalling expected outcomes and evaluation criteria at call level, and is relevant as an MEIA reference for inferring outcome expectations and aligning monitoring and evaluation design with systems-oriented funding logic.

โ€ โ€๐Ÿ“„Link: SUSFOOD2 Strategic Document

โ€

12.   Joint Call โ€œTowards Sustainable and Organic Food Systemsโ€ (CORE Organic + SUSFOOD2)
This official joint call document sets out the call rationale, expected impacts, and evaluation criteria for funded projects under the combined CORE Organic and SUSFOOD2 initiatives, and is relevant as an MEIA reference for illustrating how call design explicitly articulates impact expectations and assessment logic for projects within sustainable and organic food systems research.

โ€ โ€๐Ÿ“„Link: Joint Call โ€œTowards Sustainable and Organic Food Systemsโ€ (CORE Organic + SUSFOOD2)

โ€ โ€

13.   2021 Joint ERA-NET Cofund Call โ€œCircularityโ€ (FACCE ERA-GAS, ICT-AGRI-FOOD, SusCrop, SusAn)
This joint ERA-NET Cofund call brings together multiple initiatives under a circularity theme and explicitly sets out expected impacts (including greenhouse gas monitoring and mitigation) alongside evaluation criteria such as relevance and contribution to mitigation outcomes, and is relevant as an MEIA reference for demonstrating how monitoring and evaluation expectations are embedded directly within official call texts through articulated impact ambitions and assessment logic.

โ€ ๐Ÿ“„Link: 2021 Joint ERA-NET Cofund Call โ€œCircularityโ€ (FACCE ERA-GAS, ICT-AGRI-FOOD, SusCrop, SusAn)

โ€ 14.   ERA-LEARN Annual Report on Public-Public Partnerships (2020)
This annual report provides an overview of impacts from European public-public research partnerships, including summaries and insights from initiatives such as SUSFOOD, ICT-AGRI, and CORE Organic, illustrating how ERA-NET and ERA-Cofund networks interpreted participant outcomes and articulated impact pathways, and is relevant as an MEIA reference for understanding programme-level approaches to impact assessment and outcome reporting across partnerships.

โ€ โ€๐Ÿ“„Link: ERA-LEARN Annual Report on Public-Public Partnerships (2020)

โ€ โ€

โ€15.   BOOST4BIOEAST Deliverable D3.1 โ€“ Results from Multidimensional Competency and Biomass Mapping (2025)

โ€ โ€This deliverable presents a multidimensional indicator framework designed to assess national bioeconomy readiness across four dimensions: workforce skills, technological readiness, business and innovation environments, and national biomass potential. Developed through literature review, partner consultation, and testing across four regional HUBs, the framework includes a structured set of competency and biomass potential indicators. It provides a practical methodology for assessing bioeconomy development gaps and opportunities, supporting national bioeconomy action planning and policy development. As such, it offers a relevant MEIA reference for the design of multidimensional indicator systems and readiness assessments in bioeconomy and sustainability-oriented initiatives.

โ€ โ€๐Ÿ“„ Link: BOOST4BIOEAST Deliverable D3.1 โ€“ Results from Multidimensional Competency Biomass Mapping

โ€ โ€